AI checks the numbers, tests the assumptions and traces every score back to the evidence behind it.
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | C12 | |||
| … | F27 | 142.3 |
100 points, allocated across the same weighted rubric for every submission, in every round.
Accuracy · source quality · internal consistency · material risks
The top 20% are re-scored blind by experienced practitioners using the same five-metric rubric.
Consistency · scale · objective checks
Industry judgement · context · quality control
Finalists defend the analysis, explain their assumptions and respond when the facts change.
Every participant sees where they stand, why they scored that way and what to improve next.
Comparable evidence of real-world performance.
Strategic framing is rigorous and insight-led.
Compelling valuation with strong support.
Executive summary is crisp and persuasive.
Deepen downside scenario analysis.
Expand on integration and execution risks.
Strengthen working capital assumptions.
Explore the evidence that supports each of your scores.
Compete on live cases, be assessed against the European cohort, and leave with a verified performance record recruiters can read.
